Straight Angle™: So, is it time for GoogleNet?
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
This is what I would probably call tough business...What Google had been doing lately is amazing...The latest buzz in the slashdot circles is that, Google might be offering Wi-Fi access to entire America for free- or is it just the tip of the Ice-berg....When everyone, including me, were very much thinking of the Google's rise as the death bell for Microshit, Google seems to have very different plans...But the decision, if it is true, would have it's own business sense...
The move(if at all, to provide web access), is really nice. This would free Google from the clutches of the middle men between Google and the ISPs. The transit fees that Google pays the middlemen in the traffic routing services, to connect the user to it's servers, is high and services like GMail(which in itself is a bandwidth guzzler), Google Earth(this just sucks the bandwidth..try that with a dial-up and I am sure you would hate Google for whatever it is!!!!) take up so much of bandwidth, that the transit fees that Google pays to the third party is not un-considerable.
Also of interest is Yahoo! announcing that it has the largest index in the world..
"for those who are curious this update includes just over 19.2 billion web documents, 1.6 billion images, and over 50 million audio and video files."That was in their own words, and the index is more than twice that Google had managed till now!
In the Internet search space, though anyone can claim to give accurate results, their ability to scan through numerous documents is a factor that is considered critical..it is akin to the hide and seek that children play...the more vast and wide spread your search is, higher is your probability in finding the person you are seeking...it is same here...the more number of pages you index, it is assumed that your search result would be more accurate.
Though nothing can be more far from truth. It is undeniable that the number of indexed pages affect the search results, but indexing alone is not any measure of the search efficiency. The ultimate efficiency of a search engine is giving the exact answer to the query. But this is easier said than done. For example, the search string "Rose" can mean two(or even three or more!!) completely different things to different people. For instance:
But returning to the main point of this post, an independent inquiry and analysis of the claim of Yahoo! to have indexed more pages than anyone else and thus imply a more accurate search result(atleast to the unsuspecting users of the net, for whom, size always matters), had revealed that it is not to be so. Though Yahoo! never claimed that the more number of pages it indexs, the better is the search result, that exactly is the view they wanted to spread. But that had been contested in this report. (Via Slashdot)
The report is open for everyone(ofcourse, who know the stuff) to interpret and verify the methodology.
Jus been visits
Get awesome blog templates like this one from BlogSkins.com
Â© All that is written here are the Genuine Products of the Intellect of the author and are protected by the relevant copyright acts...If you wish to quote the highness you can do so at your own risk and at risk to the integrity of the author's cerebrum.
All that is written in this blog are the personal opinions of the author and are in no way representative of the organisation that the author has worked for or is working for or would be working for in the future.
:: Adam Smith's Controlled Greed ::
::Visual Treat ::
:: Paths Last Taken ::
::Partners in Wandering::
:: Strangers in Wandering ::
-_-Life at IMI-_-
-_-The Last Blogger-_-
-_-Toilet Seat Ideas-_-
-_-And thats what its all about...-_-
-_-The Miracle of being Second Best-_-
::Wanderers Stumbled Upon::
-_-C V Raman-_-
-_-Experiments with Life-_-
::Wanderers for India::
-_-Hewlet Packard's Blog-_-
-_-General Motor's Blog-_-
-_-Sun Microsystem's Blog-_-
-_-MSN Search Blog-_-
-_-Good News India-_-
:: Traces left behind ::