Why is it that, this sort of news gets only into The Hindu?? It seems that, MK did all the fire-fighting, sort of the statesman kind of role to "solve" the crisis amicably- without taking sides- but if this news (his interview apparently) is to believe, he had "doubts" on the nuclear deal even before Left raised issues with the deal.

I wonder how can a person, who already had doubts about the deal not take sides, when speaking on the issue?- Is it a peculiar mental distortion for MK, that he can speak on something, even though he had doubts about it, without casting those doubts on to the proceedings?

At no point did the Left parties ask him to support their viewpoint, he said

I wonder why would MK want to do such gimmicks?- To stake a claim to the already crowded statesmen list of the nation?- It reminds me of Goundamani's dialogue in Mannan-

புண்ணாக்கு விக்கறவன் குண்டூசி விக்கிறவன் எல்லாம் தொழிலதிபர்ங்கராங்கப்பா.

Hopefully, Statemenship wouldn't go the "தொழிலதிபர்" way!!

It is not just that, MK is alone in this "Who Said What" comedy- just watch what his daughter had to say on the remarks that he intentionally hurt the feelings of Hindus.

You know what does that remind me of?

நாராயணா!! இந்த கொசுத் தொல்லை தாங்க முடியலப்பா!!

And that, my dear readers, is the MK and KM part!